The fact is if you look back each chain of prophets which appeared before us Ended once at last Before Moses there was the chain of prophets which was attributed to hazrat mohawk Or let’s say is the brahim That ended when Moses appeared So the prophet just before Moses was the last of the prophets in time as well who appeared After hazrat Ibrahim alaihissalaatu wassalaam So somebody has to be last in time, but it’s no matter of pride at all Only non-Ahmadis believe this in this that it is a matter of pride so they argue we don’t believe We don’t say that hazrat Naseem alaihissalaatu wassalaam is last so he is the greatest.
There is not at all the argument it is just completely outside the mark the fact is that according to us each chain of prophets Had an end link The last ring to the chain and he was never the best This is wrong Best work before him Or let’s say no not I shouldn’t stress too much never most often than not they were not the best It was just accidental maybe some of them Were better than previous people who also appeared in the end But it is not a rule. It is just a chance The rule is that most often than not Those who appear at the end of a chain of prophets, they are not the best.
So what then and somebody has to be in the end now Let’s for a while consider that there will be other prophets who would also be entitled the prophets Let’s conceive such a situation till the day of Khyama Now would they not be as someone in the end then Will the same objection be raised to him raised against him that now you become the last The previously you said the solar cellum was not the last in time and now you are claiming yourself.
So you are a false man. Can that be said about him? Why not The concept of time for instance the Tufan-e-Nu was considered to be one black from some hundred years continue Tufan-e-Nu first clarify your view of Tufan-e-Nu please Somebody He was What did he say What did he say Totally wrong wrong entirely false because neither the Holy Quran says nor the Bible nor the history the Holy Quran tells us that the whole age of Hazrat Nuh’s Ummah was 950 years and If Tufan-e-Nu lasted 1000 years it ended after 50 years after the death of Hazrat Nuh How absurd That is not the point what I am trying to say is completely different from what you are saying now.
The fact is that to be the last in time is no position of honor or Superiority or those who passed before such a person It is just accidental. It has nothing to do with honor While the fact is that the last people On earth on whom the final destruction would come would fall Would according to our Huzoor sallallahu alaihi wa sallam be the worst people on earth Our Huzoor sallallahu alaihi wa sallam tells us that Saab would come the Qiyamah would come on Ashrar-e-Nas.
Those who are the worst people That mankind has ever produced So they were the last in time why shouldn’t they be best as well So to be last is not it not a point of pride at all pride and last Finality in time they don’t go together at all. This is what we reject in total So if anybody any prophets happens to be in the end What then? For him to be in the end is no point of pride at all So we do not insist that there shouldn’t be any prophet or it is forbidden by the Holy Quran This is totally false if somebody and we take some and we take this position the Holy Quran opens a possibility and That possibility is not closed by anyone It remains open That policy for that possibility covers Also those who are being given the status of prophet hood like the prophets of the past and Such people would continue to come as I am telling you now In Ahmadiyyat they would be a way would appear and Allah knows who they maybe they are some today we don’t know.
So Their status in the eyes of Allah would be like that of a prophet of the past So this promise is covered my you tell our Rasoola foul. I come all of you know I’m allowing him mean and the beginner was Siddiqui never showed I was falling in a Basuna alaika Rafiqa nobody can stop their promise But the argument against their coming a prophet the possibility. I’m going to saying Who would also be entitled a prophet? That argument is twofold in fact number one Answer the sallallahu alayhi wa sallam who himself was making a prophecy that there will be so many in my umma Who would be like the prophets of old? Does not call them a prophet The prophet Why this was what I explaining to him that because the status of prophet hood.
The definition of prophet hood has been transformed by the coming of our coming of our Muslim Sallallahu Sallam So only such a man could rightly be given the title of a prophet Who behaves like our Huzoor sallallahu alayhi wa sallam and who is interested with the same work? worldwide Mission as our Huzoor sallallahu alayhi wa sallam was interested with Because he has to carry his mission. He’s not to bring a new mission So obviously That mission has to be worldwide because that was the mission of our Huzoor sallallahu alayhi wa sallam and that mission also should be timeless Because Huzoor’s coming was timeless.
So such a man Would be entitled a prophet as well as would be counted among those whose status is that our prophet Of such a person we find only one mention. This is what we say only We can’t say that such people cannot come in larger number that is not our position Our position is that as far as our knowledge goes in the study of traditions We don’t find or in the tradition in the study of the holy Quran We don’t find any other person mentioned under this category.
So if Allah sent someone in future, maybe after a thousand years or so It is his job to prove to fight his battle. Why should we fight his battle as well as our own? It’s enough for us To fight our own battle leave it at that If the Prophet comes he will look after himself
