Love For All Hatred For None
Current Topic:

Using the Bible or other sources acceptable to Christians, can one prove that Adam was not the first man on earth ?

Dated: 17/08/1984

Location: The London Mosque

Language: English

Audience: General

Using the Bible or other sources acceptable to Christians, can one prove that Adam was not the first man on earth ?

No, but do they accept the scientific discovery of man? Yes, certainly. Then there is no… it’s not at all difficult to disprove whatever is said in Bible about the creation of man. Everything has already been disproved and long been disproved by the Christians themselves. All the scientific discovery about the origin of life and origin of man tells us that it is hundreds of thousands of years before Adam was ever born that we have found, we get the evidence of man’s presence on earth. And many types of men have been discovered.

Recently there was an article about Sudan. Now the limelight is being shifted to Sudan because they have discovered some remnants of human bones which indicate that perhaps the first man was born in Sudan. Previously it was Neanderthal man, then it became the Chinese man and so on and so forth. But the more and more the investigation is sinking deeper, the origin of man is being removed farther away in time from us. And it may be a million year or more, we don’t know as yet.

Is there any book or any pamphlets that I can look upon as references to this? You can ask… I mean this is a commonplace thing. I can’t refer to any particular book, but it has become just commonplace. Go to any library and tell him, give me something on the origin of man, of the age of man, how long the Homo sapien has been found on this earth to our knowledge. He would suggest so many books to you. And you can open it up at the right place and show it to your friends. Okay, thank you very much. Tomorrow then, already late. You are still here, aren’t you? Okay. The Adhan please. We are Muslims. We never call them non-Muslims. But when they call us non-Muslims, this is against our profession. They have no right. When we call them kafirs, we call them kafirs of Hazrat Masih Maud a.s. And they accept it.

0So we never attribute anything against their claims. When they call us non-Muslims, they call us the people who do not believe in Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa a.s. Which is totally false. Entirely wrong. So our position is justifiable and their position is not justifiable.

Share Article on:
Updated on November 10, 2024

Have Questions About Islam?
Get Answers Here!

Start a live chat for instant responses, or submit your questions to learn more. We’re here to provide clarity and understanding on all things Islam.

Knowledge Base

Professionally cultivate one-to-one find customer service with robust ideas.

Live Chat

Have a question on your mind? Let’s talk! Live chat is just a click away!

Ask A Question

Fill out the form below, and we will be in touch shortly.
[fluentform id="4"]